|
Planning
Literacy and Language Services
for Texas' Limited English Proficient Workers:
The Devil is in the Details
Handout
# 9:Five Options
for Workforce-Related Approaches
To Literacy and Language Learning
In efforts to serve
the multiple needs of dislocated workers grappling with both marginal
literacy in their native language as well as limited English proficiency,
a variety of efforts and initiatives have been underway in other parts
of the country for many years. A number of models have evolved to meet
the varying skills, educational levels, English proficiency, and vocational
objectives of learners. The length of time spent in English and literacy
classes, the degree of integration of language and vocational training,
and the interaction between ESL instructors and vocational instructors
all vary, depending upon the type of program. Most importantly, the
literacy and language skills of the targeted population should be considered
in selecting an effective approach or approaches. In contrast to linear
or sequential approaches to instruction, the following offer suggested
ways to integrate English language instruction and vocational training:
The ESL
approach is usually a pre-employment activity focused on
language learning for an employment and vocational context. Classes
may consist of general ESL instruction integrated with employment-related
concepts that emphasize language competencies in job skills, such
as responding to complaints and requests or seeking clarification,
but the extent of integration is largely contingent upon learners'
emerging English language and literacy proficiencies.
The Vocational
ESL Approach includes programs that take place in a vocational
setting, providing training in specific occupations and language
skills related to a particular occupation. Instruction is very focused,
so program developers must confirm in advance that jobs in these
specific occupations are indeed available in the community and accessible
by the targeted population.
The ESL
Work Experience Approach combines workplace experience with
class work in vocational ESL and ideally, in combination with vocational
skills training. This approach requires extensive time commitments
for the components to be adequately addressed, and support services
during transition from training to employment are critical. Participants
gain work experience and a reference from an employer, and prospective
employers benefit from a preview of trainees' work abilities. An
added plus: employers learn about the cultural backgrounds of future
or potential employees, and the trainees get a look at the company's
work culture.
The Workplace
ESL Approach focuses on customized training programs, usually
requested by an employer and taking place at a particular job site
for incumbent workers. This approach stresses language skills related
to specific job areas, with emphasis on job functions, occupational
knowledge, career opportunities, and organizational culture.
The Bilingual
Vocational Approach can be an appropriate
response in communities with a population of limited English proficient
workers who share a common native language. The learners' native
language is used to facilitate ESL instruction and/or vocational
training and can be combined with any of the other four approaches.
The objective: to accelerate access to full employment by those who
are unemployed or underemployed while their English language skills
are still emerging.
In its Provision
for Adult Education Programs (29.253), the Texas Education
Code recognizes the bilingual approach as a viable instructional
option with learners who do not function satisfactorily in English "whenever
it is appropriate for their optimum development".
Table
of Contents |
Next
|