Texas Center for the Advancement of Literacy & Learning Logo

Texas Adult Education Content Standards and Benchmarks
Spring 2006 Field Test

TAESP Writing Team Meeting
May 16 & 17, 2006

What You Said

  • Experience of teaching with benchmarks
  • Benefits/problems of using benchmarks
  • Strategies used
  • Ideas for professional development
  • Implementation questions
  • Assessment issues
  • Suggestions

Your Experience

Positive

  • Amazing feedback
  • Feeling comfortable after a while
  • Feeling of freedom
  • Provides organization
  • Helps to stay on task
  • Helps in multi-level classrooms

Negative

  • Confusing; Difficult
  • Frustrating; Overwhelming
  • Time consuming

Your Experience: A Continuum

  • Changed how you teach
  • Teaching multi-level classrooms
  • Helpful to new teachers

Problems

Benchmarks

  • Too many to cover/ 6 weeks too short
  • Ambiguous, complicated terms
  • Written in imperative ~ read by students, not by teachers
  • Need consistency in definitions
  • Harder to implement with new group of students

Evaluation forms

  • Distraction
  • Difficult to fill out

Lack of clear-cut assessment

Benefits

Good guide for teaching

  • Helped to find student proficiency level
  • Helped determine student progress
  • Clear vision of path: where to, how to, and to go back

Helpful features of benchmarks

  • Math benchmarks concise and easy to manage
  • Overviews/level descriptors in Speaking and Listening

Strategies Used

Standards/benchmarks

  • Reviewed and covered lower levels first
  • Focused on 2-3 benchmarks each time
  • Looked at benchmarks before and during teaching
  • Re-typed benchmarks to be used and put them up in classroom
  • Created a checklist reflecting benchmarks

Strategies Used

Lesson plan

  • Developed lesson plan first then looked at benchmarks

Resources

  • Relied on learning activities more than on benchmarks
  • Consulted writing team member

Recommendation

  • Use standards as foundations for objectives; books as resources for learning activities

Ideas for Professional Development

Show relative advantages

  • Provide relevance of teaching with standards

Show compatibility with current ways

  • Acknowledge different teaching styles
  • Student-centered---teacher-centered
  • How to use test results to assess student needs

Ideas for Professional Development

Allow observability

  • Learn and share successful methods, examples
  • Need testimonials from teachers who’ve used benchmarks
  • Led by experts knowledgeable about relative advantages

Allow trial-ability

  • Modeled teaching (videotape teachers)
  • Small group work and much discussion needed

Ideas for Professional Development

Reduce complexity on

  • Terms, objectives, implementing benchmarks
  • How to implement
  • How to plan lessons (how to align with benchmarks)
  • How to develop learning activities
  • How to assess
  • Assessment-learning cycle/teaching-learning cycle
  • Adult learning theories and needs

Ideas for Professional Development

Suggested length: a continuum

  • Twice, 2-3 hours each time
  • 6 hours
  • 2 days

Ongoing

Modes of Delivery

  • Face-to-face
  • Conference calls
  • Online
  • Videotape

Implementation Questions

Accountability?

Assessment?

Resource availability?

Documentation required?

  • Evidence of use of benchmarks by teachers?
  • Student progress stored on

Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) ?

Implementation Questions

Statewide implementation?

  • Vision?
  • Start date?
  • Mandatory?
  • Final product availability?
  • Training for administrators?
  • Burden too large on part-time teachers?

Assessment Issues

  • Need to know how aligned with assessment instruments
  • Need to know how to tie instruction and assessment

Suggestions

Benchmarks

  • Cross reference similar benchmarks
  • Need cohesiveness across benchmarks of 5 standards
  • Place activities right under benchmarks

Alignment/assessment

  • Tie benchmarks to textbooks
  • Align benchmarks to BEST+/TABE and document
  • Need assessments

Suggestions

Implementation

  • Share experience of 1st field testers with next
  • Provide consistent, clear message about standards implementation

Language

  • Use layperson’s language

Format

  • Landscape format better than portrait
  • Need same format for all standards
  • Color-code system
  • Don’t provide a thick packet: will be shelved

Suggestions

Resources needed

  • Learning activities
  • Checklist
  • Expanded glossary
  • Online, hyperlinked glossary
  • Complete appendix
  • Implementation guide
  • Communication hubs: conference calls, listservs
  • Use the Web: direct questions to certain person, FAQ list

508 UsableNet Approved (v. 2.2)

 

Center Information | Contact Us | Projects | Resources | Library | Quarterly Publication | Documents |
Calendars
| Hotline | Discussions | Research | Administrators | Teachers | Workforce Partnerships |
GED | Directory of Providers | Family Literacy | EL Civics | Site Map | Home

©1995-2008 Texas Center for the Advancement of Literacy and Learning
1-800-441-READ (7323) or 979-845-6615
FAX: 979-845-0952
E-mail: tcall@tamu.edu

- Melaney Moore-Dodson, Webmaster -

[State of Texas] [Texas Homeland Security] [Statewide Search] [State Link Policy]
[Legal Notices] [TEA Division of Discretionary Grants] [Texas A&M University]

Updated
May 8, 2008