Skip to content | Contact Us | Email | Site Map | Home
Texas Center for the Advancement of Literacy and Learning Logo

Literacy Links

Volume 10, No. 4, October 2006

IN THIS ISSUE

Adult Learner Persistence


Classroom Success = Retention
Or is it
Retention = Classroom Success?

by Marie Paiz

It is the proverbial chicken and egg problem - which does come first: classroom success or retention? I believe retention is necessary in order for your students to achieve their goals. Only then do you have classroom success. My team teacher and I have come up with some innovative ideas to retain our students.

When my team teacher and I started teaching in January of 2005, we didn’t really know how we were going to keep students coming to class. Retention was dwindling. We came up with a student of the month and attendance prizes, which helped, but our most innovative idea came towards the end of the school year. We decided to try personal trainers when classes resumed in the fall. We realized that many students work better when they have someone with whom to work through math problems. While we, as the instructors, are able to answer the questions, sometimes we just can not be in two places at once and the students get frustrated. Therefore, personal trainers became part of our curriculum.

What are personal trainers? In previous years they were known as tutors, but the connotation with a tutor is that “I am not smart enough to understand the problems, I need extra help, and people will laugh at me.” We came up with the idea of calling these tutors “personal trainers”. Everyone from celebrities to politicians and even common folk have a personal trainer to help them exercise or diet. Why not a personal trainer to help you understand math, the consequences of joining World War I, or just understanding the differences between an adjective and an adverb?

Now that we knew what we were going to do the next questions were where to find personal trainers and how to convince students to use them. We are lucky to have a university with a teacher education program in our community. Having worked with this education program I knew students in the program are required to complete hours of observation. There are times when they can not fit these extra hours into their day. In addition to being able to acquire the observation hours, these students would begin working with the students on a one-on-one basis and find out earlier in their education if they really want to teach. I approached the department chair of the program and asked if having students come and work with our GED students would solve the problem of observation hours. The answer was a resounding “Yes!”

Now all we had to do was convince the GED students that the personal trainers would make a difference in their ability to learn the material for the GED test. Once all of these obstacles had been met, we needed to determine if the personal trainers were going to make a difference with out retention rate and make our classroom a success. This would be done through attendance reports and progress testing.

Once the word was spread about the personal trainers, our evening classes began to grow by leaps and bounds. Each time we had another registration period, we would gain more students. Not only were we getting more students all the time, we were retaining the ones we had. When Christmas came, we were still having 30-35 students attending on faithfully. Then January came, and we had even more students register and more came back after the holidays. Now we had an overcrowding problem. Imagine that! More and more students were attending classes, and they wanted to stay in class. We have had several students transfer to our class from other classes due to the concept of personal trainers.

Using personal trainers allowed us, the teachers, to work with a large group while the personal trainers would work one-on-one with students as they needed help in a subject area. The use of personal trainers also allowed the GED student to learn another way to solve a problem, a way that might be easier for them to grasp and actually use on a test. Even though we saw the retention rate improve and we were acquiring more and more students, were we really having classroom success?

At this time, we have not had many of our students test and obtain their GED. However, we have had several start the testing process. For many students, taking the GED test places a financial burden on them and/or their family so they stay in class until they can afford to take the tests this does not mean that the student or the class is not successful. These students are successful, even if they have not taken the GED, because we are able to progress test the students and show a gain in the domain of significance on the TABE tests.

I can hear the teachers reading this saying, “That’s great. You have a university. You can utilize the students as personal trainers. What do we do?” Personal trainers can come from any volunteer program in your area. RSVP (Retired Seniors Volunteer Program) is a good place to start. In addition to RSVP, call your local school districts and find out where they get their mentors. There are probably a lot of people out there who would like to mentor and can not because they work during the daytime. An evening class would be ideal for them.

In conclusion, I believe retaining the students in our classroom has shown success because we are able to progress test and show gains in their domain of significance. This retention also provides us with more contact hours, something that we need when filling out grant requirements. Again, retention equals success. Therefore, I believe retention does come first and it does equal classroom success.

About the Author

Marie Paiz has worked as a part-time GED instructor for the Comal, Guadalupe, Kendall Counties Co-op for approximately 3 years. She is a graduate of Texas Lutheran University and has begun postgraduate work at St. Mary’s University in San Antonio. In addition to working as a GED instructor Marie also works full-time as an Administrative Assistant for Texas Lutheran University. She is married and has two children in college.

Bobby Worldwide Approved 508 Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional


LITERACY LINKS is published quarterly by
The Texas Adult Literacy Clearinghouse,
a project housed in the Texas Center for the Advancement of Literacy & Learning
Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4477

The contents of Literacy Links do not necessarily represent the views or opinions
of the Texas Center for the Advancement of Literacy & Learning,
Texas A&M University, Texas Education Agency, nor Harris County Department of Education.

Center Information | Contact Us | Projects | Resources | Library | Quarterly Publication | Documents |
Calendars
| Hotline | Discussions | Research | Administrators | Teachers | Workforce |
GED | Directory of Providers | Family Literacy | EL Civics | Site Map | Home | PDF Reader

©1995-2009 Texas Center for the Advancement of Literacy and Learning
1-800-441-READ (7323) or 979-845-6615
FAX: 979-845-0952
E-mail: tcall@tamu.edu

- Melaney Moore-Dodson, Webmaster -

[State of Texas] [Texas Homeland Security] [Statewide Search] [State Link Policy]
[Legal Notices] [TEA Division of Discretionary Grants] [Texas A&M University]

Updated
June 25, 2009