5.0 Performance Measures (Section 224(b)(4))
5.1 Eligible Agency Performance Measures (Sec. 212)
Management Information System
All adult education data that will be used in the performance accountability system will originate from the Texas Educating Adult Management System (TEAMS) management information system. TEAMS is TEA's state-of-the-art, web-enabled system that maintains student-by-student demographic and achievement data as well as information about class, site, program, and provider information. While TEAMS provides TEA with a comprehensive statewide database, TEAMS is also each local program's own database and is always accessible for information and analysis. TEAMS users can analyze class, site, and/or program data through use of the standard reports that can be generated at the user level. TEAMS provides a wide range of information about adult education, including snapshots of student and program performance.
Adult Education Guidance Information System (AEGIS)
Evaluation of the adult education and family literacy program will be conducted quarterly through the Adult Education Guidance Information System (AEGIS) with a final report due annually to ascertain the extent to which both the Texas statewide program and each local provider have met projected levels of performance for each core indicator established in the State Plan. AEGIS will perform automatic quarterly desk reviews for each grantee based on the performance measures and core indicators negotiated with USDOEand set by the program in their application thus comparing targets to actual student data entered into the management information system. Quarterly, programs will submit a Data Sign Off report to the agency to verify that data has been entered TEAMS, i.e., management information system. AEGIS will raise issues and electronically notify programs of satisfactory and unsatisfactory progress toward performance measures. The two major focuses of the evaluation will be the effectiveness of Texas programs statewide and local providers in attaining the core indicators negotiated with the USDOE and established by the state and to identify areas where state leadership activities, technical assistance, and staff development may be directed for program improvement.
Standardized Assessment Policy
The State of Texas has adopted, under the legislative mandate of HB 1640 two standardized assessment instruments to measure performance by participants in adult education programs. The Test of Adult Basic Education (TABE) is used for Basic Skills and Secondary Education students and the Basic English Skills Test (BEST) for Limited English Proficient (LEP) students and second language learners. Texas will implement during 2005-2007 the BEST Plus as Center for Applied Linguistics (CAL) phases out BEST forms B and C. Texas will continue to use the BEST Literacy version of the BEST series. Programs assess students after at least 40 hours of instruction but not before at least six weeks of instruction have been completed. This policy is flexible to accommodate various configurations of schedules, i.e., sites that offer 4 to 6 hours of instruction per week and those that offer up to 35 hours of instruction per week. The purpose is to allow flexibility, not test students too often, and allow students who exit the program hastily to have a post assessment. Special needs students are tested with the Literacy subtest of the TABE and the raw score is entered into TEAMS. Local providers do not enroll students into TEAMS without some type of assessment and the Literacy subtest of the TABE provides formality for special needs students without frustrating them.
Federal Performance Measure #1: Demonstrated improvement in literacy skills, reading writing, and speaking the English language, numeracy, problem solving, English language acquisition, and other literacy skills
Methodology: Calculate the numbers and percentage of students who demonstrate a gain in scores on standardized tests adopted by the Texas Education Agency from baseline assessment to progress assessment over a specified time period.
Federal Performance Measure #2: Achievement of a High School Equivalency Certificate (GED) or a high school diploma
Methodology: Use an automated record match of the Texas Educating Adult Management System (TEAMS) student records with the Agency's GED database and PEIMS at the close of the fiscal year at least annually. (At present, the system matches GED completions nightly.)
Federal Performance Measure #3: Required Transitions: Placement in, retention in, or completion of postsecondary education, training, unsubsidized employment or career advancement
Methodology: Use an automated record match of the Texas Educating Adult Management System (TEAMS) student records through a memorandum of understanding with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to perform a match with the Texas Workforce Commission databases of participants in job training and Unemployment Insurance (UI) and the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board database of public colleges and universities annually to calculate the numbers and percentages of adult education students who enter employment, postsecondary education, or job training. (At present, post-secondary institutions are not required to enter data into a statewide system; therefore, Texas is considering a combination data match and survey method.
5.2 Optional - Additional Indicators
Additional indicators to the AEFLA core indicators of performance will be added to the Texas adult education accountability system.
State Accountability Performance Measure #4:
Retention:
Methodology: Using TEAMS student records, calculate the numbers and percentages of students enrolled [who have participated in baseline assessment] who attend at least 12 hours of instruction and the percentage of those who participate in progress assessment (after a specified time period).
Retention #1: Percent of the students with 12 hours of instruction and baseline assessment. |
75% (percent) |
Retention #2: Percent of the students with baseline assessment and progress assessment. |
65% (percent) |
State Accountability Performance Measure #5:
Required Gains: Percent of students who will demonstrate gains in a Standardized Assessment
Methodology: Calculate the numbers and percentage of students who demonstrate a gain in scores on standardized tests adopted by the Texas Education Agency from baseline assessment to progress assessment (over a specified time period).
ASSESSMENT |
Percentage of Students who will make a Gain on the Assessment |
|---|---|
TABE READING |
52% (percent) |
TABE LANGUAGE |
52% (percent) |
TABE MATHEMATICS |
52% (percent) |
BEST or BEST Plus ORAL INTERVIEW |
67% (percent) |
BEST LITERACY SKILLS |
52% (percent) |
State Accountability Performance Measure #6:
Transition: Percent of adult learners enrolled in Adult Secondary Education who achieve a GED or diploma within the fiscal year
Methodology: Use an automated record match of the Adult and Community Education System (ACES) student records with the Agency's GED database and PEIMS at the close of the fiscal year and at 6- and 12-month intervals to calculate the numbers and percentage of Adult Secondary Education students who achieve a GED or diploma.
TRANSITION OUTCOME: Percent of adult learners enrolled in Adult Secondary Education who achieve a GED or diploma within the fiscal year |
23% (percent) |
5.3 Levels of Performance
a. Federal Target Performance Measures
| Level | 2000-2001 Actual |
2001-2002 |
2001-2002 |
2002-2003 |
2002-2003 Actual |
2003-2004 |
2003-2004 Actual | 2004-2005 |
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
2005-2006 |
2006-2007 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beginning |
23% |
14% |
28% |
18% |
37% |
25% |
42% |
43% |
50% |
44% |
% |
51% |
Beginning |
27% |
19% |
29% |
23% |
35% |
29% |
39% |
40% |
42% |
41% |
% |
43% |
Low |
26% |
22% |
31% |
24% |
36% |
28% |
39% |
38% |
43% |
39% |
% |
44% |
High |
23% |
22% |
24% |
22% |
27% |
25% |
31% |
30% |
33% |
32% |
% |
34% |
Beginning |
31% |
21% |
33% |
23% |
41% |
28% |
44% |
44% |
48% |
45% |
% |
49% |
Beginning |
31% |
21% |
33% |
25% |
37% |
28% |
40% |
51% |
43% |
45% |
% |
N\A |
Low |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50% |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50% |
Low |
35% |
22% |
44% |
28% |
48% |
34% |
51% |
51% |
54% |
53% |
% |
55% |
High |
35% |
22% |
33% |
28% |
37% |
34% |
40% |
41% |
39% |
42% |
% |
42% |
Low |
32% |
23% |
36% |
27% |
41% |
33% |
45% |
42% |
24% |
45% |
% |
N\A |
High |
*13% |
23% |
*7% |
17% |
*10% |
33% |
*11% |
11% |
*0% |
15% |
% |
N\A |
Advanced |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41% |
Low ASE |
29% |
26% |
44% |
27% |
45% |
30% |
51% |
50% |
52% |
52% |
% |
53% |
High ASE |
28% |
|
35% |
|
31% |
|
39% |
|
40% |
|
|
N\A |
Entered Employment |
8% |
15% |
**69% |
23% |
**64% |
25% |
21% |
** 20% |
29% |
21% |
% |
30% |
Retained Employment |
19% |
16% |
20% |
20% |
59% |
26% |
38% |
61% |
54% |
45% |
% |
55% |
High School Completion |
22% |
26% |
38% |
11% |
64% |
25% |
50% |
66% |
57% |
55% |
% |
58% |
Further Education / Training |
6% |
16% |
14% |
12% |
24% |
25% |
8% |
26% |
19% |
20% |
% |
20% |
b. Description of Federal Core Measures
Outcome Measures
1. Federal Core Outcome Measure #1: Educational Gain
2. Federal Core Outcome Measure #2: Entered Employment
3. Federal Core Outcome Measure #3: Retained Employment
4. Federal Core Outcome Measure #4: Receipt of a Secondary School Diploma or GED
5. Federal Core Outcome Measure #5: Placement in Postsecondary Education or Training
c. Levels of Performance
Texas' adopted performance measures for its system of accountability are consistent with the core indicators contained in AEFLA; in fact, the wording of performance measures 1 - 3 mirrors the actual language of the legislation. In accordance with AEFLA and under direction of the Commissioner of Education, Texas' performance measures are objective, quantifiable, and measurable (methodologies for measuring were included in the specifications adopted by the Task Force). Also, in accordance with AEFLA and under direction of the Commissioner of Education, Texas will set levels of performance that will show the progress of TEA's statewide system of adult education and literacy toward continuously improving performance.
5.4 Factors (Sec. 212 (b) (3) (A) (iv))
The Texas Workforce Investment Council (TWIC) has collaboratively developed a strategic plan entitled "Destination 2010: FY 2004-FY2009 Strategic Plan for the Texas Workforce Development System." The plan was mandated and developed when the 78th Texas Legislature passed Senate Bill 281 (SB 281), and the plan was signed by the Governor on October 15, 2003. This plan is an “overarching strategic plan for the Texas Workforce Development System” and “develops a single strategic plan that establishes the framework for budgeting and operation of the workforce development system.” The goals, objectives and core performance measures in the strategic plan drive the planning and coordinating efforts among local education, training, employment and support service providers and apply to all state and federally funded workforce development programs, including WIA, Employment Service, state welfare reform, welfare-to-work, school-to-careers, and adult education and literacy. While the Workforce Investment Act largely ratifies the Texas system of workforce development, TWIC is assessing achievements under the current strategic plan and implementing a new strategic plan. Individual agencies involved in the workforce system have largely incorporated the goals and measures into their own systems, and the Council is establishing a framework for the budgeting and operation of the workforce system administered by agencies represented on the Council.