Extension of Texas State Plan for
Adult Education and Family Literacy
5.0 Performance Measures
(Section 224(b)(4))
5.1 Eligible Agency Performance
Measures (Sec. 212)
Management Information System
All adult education data that will be used in the performance
accountability system will originate from the Texas Educating
Adult Management System (TEAMS) management information system. TEAMS
is TEA's state-of-the-art, web-enabled system that maintains student-by-student
demographic and achievement data as well as information about class,
site, program, and provider information. While TEAMS provides
TEA with a comprehensive statewide database, TEAMS is also each local
program's own database and is always accessible for information and
analysis. TEAMS users can analyze class, site, and/or program
data through use of the standard reports that can be generated at
the user level. TEAMS provides a wide range of information
about adult education, including snapshots of student and program
performance.
Adult Education Guidance
Information System
(AEGIS)
Evaluation of the adult education and family literacy program will
be conducted quarterly through the Adult Education Guidance Information
System (AEGIS) with a final report due annually to ascertain the extent
to which both the Texas statewide program and each local provider have
met projected levels of performance for each core indicator established
in the State Plan. AEGIS will perform automatic quarterly desk
reviews for each grantee based on the performance measures and core
indicators negotiated with USDOEand
set by the program in their application thus comparing targets to actual
student data entered into the management information system. Quarterly,
programs will submit a Data Sign Off report to the agency to verify
that data has been entered TEAMS, i.e., management information system. AEGIS
will raise issues and electronically notify programs of satisfactory
and unsatisfactory progress toward performance measures. The
two major focuses of the evaluation will be the effectiveness of Texas
programs statewide and local providers in attaining the core indicators
negotiated with the USDOE and established by the state and to identify
areas where state leadership activities, technical assistance, and
staff development may be directed for program improvement.
Standardized Assessment
Policy
The State of Texas has adopted, under the legislative mandate of HB 1640
two standardized assessment instruments to measure performance by
participants in adult education programs. The Test of Adult Basic
Education (TABE)
is used for Basic Skills and Secondary Education students and the
Basic English Skills Test (BEST)
for Limited English Proficient (LEP)
students and second language learners. Texas will implement during
2005-2007 the BEST Plus as Center for Applied Linguistics
(CAL)
phases out BEST forms B and C. Texas will continue to use the BEST
Literacy version of the BEST series. Programs assess students after
at least 40 hours of instruction but not before at least six weeks
of instruction have been completed. This policy is flexible to accommodate
various configurations of schedules, i.e., sites that offer 4 to
6 hours of instruction per week and those that offer up to 35 hours
of instruction per week. The purpose is to allow flexibility, not
test students too often, and allow students who exit the program
hastily to have a post assessment. Special needs students are tested
with the Literacy subtest of the TABE and the raw score is entered
into TEAMS. Local providers do not enroll students into TEAMS without
some type of assessment and the Literacy subtest of the TABE provides
formality for special needs students without frustrating them.
Federal Performance
Measure #1: Demonstrated improvement in literacy
skills, reading writing, and speaking the English language, numeracy,
problem solving, English language acquisition, and other literacy
skills
Methodology: Calculate
the numbers and percentage of students who demonstrate a gain in scores
on standardized tests adopted by the Texas Education Agency from baseline
assessment to progress assessment over a specified time period.
Federal Performance
Measure #2: Achievement of a High School Equivalency
Certificate (GED)
or a high school diploma
Methodology: Use
an automated record match of the Texas Educating Adult Management System
(TEAMS) student records with the Agency's GED database and PEIMS at
the close of the fiscal year at least annually. (At present, the
system matches GED completions nightly.)
Federal Performance
Measure #3: Required Transitions: Placement in,
retention in, or completion of postsecondary education, training,
unsubsidized employment or career advancement
Methodology: Use
an automated record match of the Texas Educating Adult Management System
(TEAMS) student records through a memorandum of understanding with
the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to perform a match with
the Texas Workforce Commission databases of participants in job training
and Unemployment Insurance (UI)
and the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board database of public
colleges and universities annually to calculate the numbers and percentages
of adult education students who enter employment, postsecondary education,
or job training. (At present, post-secondary institutions are not required
to enter data into a statewide system; therefore, Texas is considering
a combination data match and survey method.
5.2 Optional - Additional
Indicators
Additional indicators to the AEFLA core
indicators of performance will be added to the Texas adult education
accountability system.
State Accountability Performance Measure #4:
Retention:
Methodology: Using
TEAMS student records, calculate the numbers
and percentages of students enrolled [who have participated in
baseline assessment] who attend at least 12 hours of instruction and
the percentage of those who participate in progress assessment (after
a specified time period).
Retention
#1: Percent of the students with 12 hours of instruction and
baseline assessment. |
75%
(percent) |
Retention
#2: Percent of the students with baseline assessment and progress
assessment. |
65%
(percent) |
State Accountability Performance Measure #5:
Required Gains:
Percent of students who will demonstrate gains in a Standardized Assessment
Methodology: Calculate
the numbers and percentage of students who demonstrate a gain in scores
on standardized tests adopted by the Texas Education Agency from baseline
assessment to progress assessment (over a specified time period).
ASSESSMENT |
Percentage
of Students who will make a Gain on the Assessment |
TABE READING |
52%
(percent) |
TABE LANGUAGE |
52%
(percent) |
TABE MATHEMATICS |
52%
(percent) |
BEST or BEST
Plus ORAL INTERVIEW |
67%
(percent) |
BEST LITERACY
SKILLS |
52%
(percent) |
State Accountability Performance Measure #6:
Transition: Percent of adult learners enrolled in Adult Secondary Education who achieve a GED or diploma within the fiscal year
Methodology: Use an automated record match of the Adult and Community Education System (ACES) student records with the Agency's GED database and PEIMS at the close of the fiscal year and at 6- and 12-month intervals to calculate the numbers and percentage of Adult Secondary Education students who achieve a GED or diploma.
TRANSITION
OUTCOME: Percent of adult learners enrolled in Adult Secondary
Education who achieve a GED or diploma within the fiscal year |
23%
(percent) |
5.3 Levels of Performance
a. Federal Target Performance Measures
| Level |
2000-2001
Actual |
2001-2002
Target |
2001-2002
Actual |
2002-2003
Target |
2002-2003
Actual |
2003-2004
Target |
2003-2004 Actual |
2004-2005
Target |
2004-2005
Actual |
2005-2006
Target |
2005-2006
Unavailable |
2006-2007
Targets |
Beginning
Literacy ABE |
23% |
14% |
28% |
18% |
37% |
25% |
42% |
43% |
50% |
44% |
% |
51% |
Beginning
ABE |
27% |
19% |
29% |
23% |
35% |
29% |
39% |
40% |
42% |
41% |
% |
43% |
Low
Intermediate ABE |
26% |
22% |
31% |
24% |
36% |
28% |
39% |
38% |
43% |
39% |
% |
44% |
High
Intermediate ABE |
23% |
22% |
24% |
22% |
27% |
25% |
31% |
30% |
33% |
32% |
% |
34% |
Beginning
Literacy ESL |
31% |
21% |
33% |
23% |
41% |
28% |
44% |
44% |
48% |
45% |
% |
49% |
Beginning
Basic ESL |
31% |
21% |
33% |
25% |
37% |
28% |
40% |
51% |
43% |
45% |
% |
N\A |
Low
Beginning ESL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50% |
High
Beginning ESL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50% |
Low
Intermediate ESL |
35% |
22% |
44% |
28% |
48% |
34% |
51% |
51% |
54% |
53% |
% |
55% |
High
Intermediate ESL |
35% |
22% |
33% |
28% |
37% |
34% |
40% |
41% |
39% |
42% |
% |
42% |
Low
Advanced ESL |
32% |
23% |
36% |
27% |
41% |
33% |
45% |
42% |
24% |
45% |
% |
N\A |
High
Advanced ESL |
*13% |
23% |
*7% |
17% |
*10% |
33% |
*11% |
11% |
*0% |
15% |
% |
N\A |
Advanced
ESL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41% |
Low ASE |
29% |
26% |
44% |
27% |
45% |
30% |
51% |
50% |
52% |
52% |
% |
53% |
High ASE |
28% |
|
35% |
|
31% |
|
39% |
|
40% |
|
|
N\A |
Entered Employment |
8% |
15% |
**69% |
23% |
**64% |
25% |
21% |
** 20% |
29% |
21% |
% |
30% |
Retained Employment |
19% |
16% |
20% |
20% |
59% |
26% |
38% |
61% |
54% |
45% |
% |
55% |
High School Completion |
22% |
26% |
38% |
11% |
64% |
25% |
50% |
66% |
57% |
55% |
% |
58% |
Further Education / Training |
6% |
16% |
14% |
12% |
24% |
25% |
8% |
26% |
19% |
20% |
% |
20% |
b. Description of Federal
Core Measures
Outcome Measures
1. Federal Core Outcome Measure
#1: Educational Gain
- Definition: Learner completes or advances one or more educational
functioning levels from starting level measured on entry into the program.
- Applicable Population: All learners.
- Collection Procedure: At intake, an individual learner’s
educational functioning level is determined within the functional
level descriptors, using a uniform, standardized assessment procedure
approved by the state. The assessment procedure may be a standardized
test or a performance assessment with standardized scoring protocols. The
functional level descriptors describe what a learner entering that
level can do in the areas of reading and writing, numeracy, speaking
and listening. The local program need not assess the learner
in all areas, but the assessment should be in the areas in which
instruction will be focused. If the learner is functioning
at different levels in the areas, the lowest functioning level will
be the basis for initial placement. To determine gain, the
learner will be assessed again at least once after at least 40 hours
of instructional or at the end of the class or at the end of the
program year. If more than one assessment is given, the latest
assessment will be used to determine completion or advancement. An “advance” or “completion” is
recorded if, according to a subsequent assessment, the student has
entry-level skills corresponding to one or more levels higher than
the incoming level in the areas initially used for placement. The
lowest functioning level will be used to make this determination. Texas
will use the Test of Adult Basic Education (TABE, Forms 7-8
and forms 9-10), total reading and total math scale scores and
grade equivalents; Student Performance Levels (SPL) for ESL in
both speaking and reading; and oral scores of the Basic English
Skills Test (BEST) for ESL.
- Federal Reporting: Total number of learners who complete a level
during the program is reported and a rate or percentage of level
completion can be computed. The number who continue in the
program after completing a level, the number who fail to complete
a level and leave the program, and the number who remain in the same
level are recorded to obtain a fuller picture of student flow and
retention.
2. Federal Core Outcome Measure
#2: Entered Employment
- Definition: Learner obtains a job by the end of the first quarter
after the program exit quarter.
- Applicable Population: Learners who are not employed at time of entry
and who have a short-term main or secondary goal of obtaining employment.
- Collection Procedure: At intake, the local program collects
the individual learner’s employment status and employment goal. Entered
employment is measured any time from enrollment until the end of
the first quarter after program exit quarter by data matching procedures. Note
that a job obtained while the student is enrolled can be counted
for entered employment but is reported on exit from the program.
Employment is defined as working in a paid, unsubsidized job, or
working 15 hours or more per week in an unpaid job on a farm or business
operated by a family member or the student. The exit quarter is the
quarter when instruction ends, the learner terminates,
or has not received instruction for 90 days and is not scheduled
to receive further instruction.
- Federal Reporting: Total number of learners who enter employment
is reported to compute a rate or percentage, divide this total by
the total relevant population (number of learners in the workforce
who are unemployed at entry and had a main or secondary goal of obtaining
employment).
3. Federal Core Outcome
Measure #3: Retained Employment
- Definition: Learner remains employed in the third quarter after exit
quarter.
- Applicable Population: Learners who, at time of entry were not employed and had a
short term main or secondary goal of obtaining employment, and
who entered employment by the first quarter after exit quarter;
and learners who are employed at entry and who have a short term
main or secondary goal of improved or retained employment.
- Collection Procedure: For students who obtain a job while enrolled, students who
obtain a job by the end of the first quarter after the exit quarter,
and students who are employed at entry and had a goal of improved
employment, retained employment is measured in the third quarter
after exit quarter. Data will be obtained by data matching.
- Federal Reporting: Total number of learners who retained employment is reported
to compute a rate or percentage by dividing this total by the
total relevant population (number of learners in the workforce
who were not employed at entry, had a short term main or secondary
goal of obtaining employment and who entered employment; and
learners employed at entry with a short term main or secondary
goal of improved or retained employment).
4. Federal Core Outcome
Measure #4: Receipt of a Secondary School Diploma or GED
- Definition: Learner obtains certification by attaining passing scores
on the General Education Development (GED) tests, or who obtains a
diploma.
- Applicable Population: All learners with a main or secondary goal
of passing the GED tests or obtaining a secondary school diploma or
its recognized equivalent,
- Collection Procedure: Passage of GED tests or receipt of a secondary
school diploma is obtained through data match from GED testing agency.
GED test passage attainment is recorded any time up to the reporting
deadline (December 31).
- Federal Reporting: Total number of learners who obtain GED certification and secondary
school diplomas and number who had this short-term goal is reported.
To compute a rate or percentage of attainment, the number of
students receiving a secondary school diploma or GED is divided
by the total number of learners who had a main or secondary goal
of secondary credential attainment.
5. Federal Core Outcome
Measure #5: Placement in Postsecondary Education or Training
- Definition: Learner enrolls in a postsecondary educational or occupational
skills training program that does not duplicate other services or training
received, regardless of whether the prior services or training were
completed.
- Applicable Population: All learners with a goal of placement in postsecondary
education or training.
- Collection Procedure: Information on enrollment into training or
postsecondary educational program is obtained through data match from
other education and training agency such as job training programs,
adult postsecondary education programs, and community and four-year
colleges and universities. Placement is recorded any time up to the
reporting deadline (December 31).
- Federal Reporting: Total number of learners who enter postsecondary
education or a training program and number who had this goal is reported.
To compute a rate of placement, the number of students enrolling in
postsecondary education or training is divided by the total number
of learners with a goal of advancing to postsecondary education or
training.
c. Levels of Performance
Texas' adopted performance measures for its system of accountability
are consistent with the core indicators contained in AEFLA; in fact,
the wording of performance measures 1 - 3 mirrors the actual language
of the legislation. In accordance with AEFLA and under direction of
the Commissioner of Education, Texas' performance measures are objective,
quantifiable, and measurable (methodologies for measuring were included
in the specifications adopted by the Task Force). Also, in accordance
with AEFLA and under direction of the Commissioner of Education, Texas
will set levels of performance that will show the progress of TEA's
statewide system of adult education and literacy toward continuously
improving performance.
5.4 Factors (Sec. 212
(b) (3) (A) (iv))
The Texas Workforce Investment Council (TWIC)
has collaboratively developed a strategic plan entitled "Destination
2010: FY 2004-FY2009 Strategic Plan for the Texas Workforce Development
System." The plan was mandated and developed when
the 78th Texas Legislature passed Senate Bill 281 (SB 281), and
the plan was signed by the Governor on October 15, 2003. This plan
is an “overarching
strategic plan for the Texas Workforce Development System” and “develops
a single strategic plan that establishes the framework for budgeting
and operation of the workforce development system.” The goals,
objectives and core performance measures in the strategic plan drive
the planning and coordinating efforts among local education, training,
employment and support service providers and apply to all state and
federally funded workforce development programs, including WIA,
Employment Service, state welfare reform, welfare-to-work, school-to-careers,
and adult education and literacy. While the Workforce Investment
Act largely ratifies the Texas system of workforce development, TWIC
is assessing achievements under the current strategic plan and implementing
a new strategic plan. Individual agencies involved in the workforce
system have largely incorporated the goals and measures into their
own systems, and the Council is establishing a framework for the
budgeting and operation of the workforce system administered by agencies
represented on the Council.
Next | Table
of Contents | Previous