Texas Even Start Administrative Manual
June 2004, (Revised January 2008)
Even Start Guidance
STATE ADMINISTRATION
The Department awards formula grants to State educational agencies
(SEAs or States), with each State receiving funding based on the relative
proportion of funds it receives under the Part A of Title I allocation
formula. States subsequently make competitive discretionary subgrant
awards to partnerships of local educational agencies (LEAs) and other
public and private entities for Even Start Family Literacy projects.
State Plans
States must submit a State plan to the U.S. Department of Education
for their administration of Even Start, but may apply for Even Start
funds either through a consolidated State plan under section 9302 or
through a separate Even Start State plan. (See the Education Department
General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR), sections 76.100 – 76.106.)
Committee of Practitioners
Each State must form a Committee of Practitioners to advise the State
in carrying out its responsibilities under Even Start and other programs
under Title I of the ESEA. The Committee of Practitioners reviews, prior
to publication, any proposed or final State rules or regulations issued
concerning the program. (Section 1903(b))
The Committee of Practitioners must also be substantially involved
in the development of the separate or consolidated State plan and continue
to be involved in the monitoring of the plan’s implementation by
the State. For example, the Committee reviews portions of the State plan
describing the Even Start subgrant competition process.
| Example: The Committee reviews
a State’s Even Start indicators of program quality to ensure
that they are of high quality and coordinated with other related
State-administered programs. |
Membership
At a minimum, the Committee of Practitioners must include the following:
- representatives of LEAs, as a majority of its members;
- administrators;
- teachers, including vocational educators;
- parents;
- members of local boards of education;
- representatives of private school children; and
- pupil services personnel.
A State may also include additional members, such as family literacy
experts or other individuals, who are familiar with Even Start. If no
family literacy experts or individuals familiar with Even Start are formally
on the Committee of Practitioners, a State is encouraged to invite such
persons to participate in Committee of Practitioners meetings if Even
Start or family literacy policies are on the agenda for discussion.
| Example: A Committee of Practitioners
for a State is composed of: 20 urban and rural school administrators,
two non-public school representatives, five parents, two pupil personnel
services representatives, six teachers, one local school board member,
and three liaisons from the State Education Department. |
State-Level Activities
A State may reserve up to 6 percent of its Even Start grant for the
following State-level activities:
- administration (Section 1233(a)(1));
- technical assistance under section 1233(a)(2), provided to Even
Start subgrantees for program improvement and replication through one
or more subgrants or contracts with third parties;
- technical assistance under section 1234(c), provided to Even Start
subgrantees to improve the quality of Even Start family literacy services
(early childhood education, adult literacy (adult basic and secondary-level
education and instruction for English language learners), parenting
education, and interactive parent and child literacy activities) through
a subgrant, contract, or cooperative agreement with a qualified entity;
- technical assistance under section 1234(c) to help local programs
raise additional funds, provided through a subcontract, contract, or
cooperative agreement with a qualified entity; and
- activities to develop, implement, and use the State’s Even
Start indicators of program quality under section 1240.
As explained in more detail below, in order to support the high quality
implementation of local projects, a State has significant flexibility
under these various functions in how it divides State-level activities.
The Secretary encourages States to specify in their accounting records
how, and under what authority, the State is using its State-level funds.
However, of the total that the State reserves for these State-level activities,
the State may use no more than one-half of the total amount for administrative
activities. (Section 1233(a)).
Q1: If a State reserves
a total of 4 percent from its Even Start grant for administration
and technical assistance, what percentage can the State use for
administration?
A1: The State can use no more than 2 percent,
because the statute states that the costs for administration may
not exceed half of the total amount reserved for both administration
and technical assistance. In other words, a State may take up to
half of the amount reserved, and not half of 6 percent. |
After determining the amount of funds to be used for State-level
activities (up to 6 percent of the State’s total grant amount)
and identifying the portion of those funds to be used for activities
that it categorizes as administrative (up to one half of the total
amount reserved), the State may use the balance of its State-level
funds as described below to provide technical assistance and to carry
out the State’s indicators of program quality. The technical
assistance should be designed to improve local programs and support
the replication of successful programs, help local programs raise additional
funds and improve the quality of Even Start family literacy services,
and develop, implement, and use the State’s indicators of program
quality.
Administration
As explained above, a State may use up to one half of the total amount
it reserves for State-level administrative activities. The State may
use its administrative funds for indirect and direct administration costs,
and to provide technical assistance and training to local Even Start
projects to improve participant achievement results.
Q2: What indirect cost
rate applies to the funds that a State reserves for State-level
activities?
A2: The State may use its unrestricted indirect
cost rate for Even Start funds that the State reserves for State-level
activities because Even Start is not subject to a supplement-not-supplant
requirement. (EDGAR, sections 76.560 – 76.580.) |
Under section 9201, a State may consolidate its Even Start administrative
funds with State administrative funds from some of the programs under
the ESEA if the SEA is able to demonstrate that the majority of the agency’s
resources come from non-Federal sources. Eligible programs under section
9201 include any ESEA program in which funds are authorized to be used
for administration, and any other programs that the Secretary designates.
Technical Assistance
A State may provide training and technical assistance for local subgrantees
in several ways. Different statutory requirements apply depending upon
the type of training and technical assistance that the State chooses
to provide. States may provide these activities directly, as part of
the State’s administrative function discussed above or as a part
of its implementation of the State’s Even Start indicators of program
quality discussed below.
In addition, a State may use a portion of the non-administrative State-level
funds it has reserved to provide technical assistance to Even Start projects
under section 1233(a)(2), to improve those projects and replicate those
of high quality. If the State chooses to provide technical assistance
under section 1233(a)(2) to improve or replicate Even Start projects,
it must also do so through a subgrant or contract with another entity.
A State may also use a portion of the non-administrative State-level
funds it reserves to provide technical assistance and training under
section 1234(c), to assist local Even Start projects in improving the
quality of their family literacy services (that is, to improve one or
more of the Even Start core components that make up “family literacy
services”). The State must provide this technical assistance and
training through one or more subgrants, contracts, or cooperative agreements
with an entity that has experience in offering high-quality training
and technical assistance to family literacy providers. In addition, the
State must give priority to programs of low quality as evaluated based
on a State’s indicators of program quality.
For local programs that the State determines to have demonstrated effectiveness,
the State also may use technical assistance funds under section 1234(c)
to help those programs access and leverage additional funds to expand
services to families and reduce waiting lists for services, including
through using such mechanisms as requesting and applying for non-Federal
resources.
Q3: How can a State provide
technical assistance to help a local project in accessing and leveraging
additional funds?
A3: A State may use some of the funds it reserves
for State-level activities to provide technical assistance to help
local projects, that have demonstrated their effectiveness in helping
families make educational gains, to access and leverage additional
funds in order to expand or sustain services to eligible families.
Such technical assistance may include activities such as providing
a grant writing or oral presentation workshop, assisting a local
project in initiating a local campaign to attract greater community
investment in the local project, or compiling a directory of available
funding resources. |
The State’s use of funds for technical assistance and training
in improving family literacy services under section 1234(c) may not result
in a decrease from the level of activities and services that subgrantees
provided to program participants in the previous year (section 1234(c)(1)).
In other words, a State’s reservation of funds for technical assistance
and training under section 1234(c) cannot negatively affect the quality
and intensity of services that can be provided by subgrantees to their
program participants.
Developing and Using Even Start Indicators of Program Quality
A State may also use funds it reserves for technical assistance to
develop and use its State indicators of program quality, as described
in section 1240, to monitor, evaluate, and improve local projects within
the State. These technical assistance activities, for example, may include
training local project staff and evaluators on the following: how to
improve the content of local evaluations so that they are aligned with
State indicators of program quality; how to better use local evaluations
for continuous program improvement; how to identify high quality professional
development activities for local Even Start staff; and strategies to
improve participant retention and literacy achievement results. (See
National Evaluation, Local Evaluation, and Indicators of Program Quality
-- Indicators of Program Quality section.) In addition, a State could
use those funds to provide the technical assistance required under section
1233(a)(3) to improve local projects that have made insufficient progress
on the State’s indicators of program quality before the State discontinues
those projects for insufficient progress.
Unlike the technical assistance and training that a State provides under
sections 1233(a)(2) and 1234(c), a State may provide technical assistance
and training under section 1240 to local subgrantees and evaluators on
its indicators of program quality either directly or through a contract
with another qualified entity.
Q4: When can a State provide
technical assistance and training directly?
A4: A State can directly provide technical assistance
for activities related to the development and use (such as through
monitoring, evaluation, and program improvement) of State indicators
of program quality. For all other technical assistance and training,
including helping local programs of demonstrated effectiveness
to access and leverage additional funds for the purpose of expanding
services and reducing waiting lists, a State must use an outside
entity. (Sections 1233(a)(2) and 1234(c)(4)) |
Previous | Next | Table
of Contents