![]()
TO BUILD LOCAL CAPACITY
YOU CAN'T DO IT ALONE
NOBODY CAN
IT REALLY DOES TAKE A VILLAGE
WE CAME HERE FOR A REASON!!
1990 U.S.
Census
Kyle, Texas
- 52% of people over 25 do not have a high
school diploma or GED- 100% of female headed households with children
under 6 live in poverty- Median household income = $20, 947
- 33.6% below poverty level
In Buda, Texas (to immediate North)- Median household income = $39,875
- 5.1% below poverty level
RURAL ISOLATION
METHOD TO DATE
To leverage the Maximum Amount of Education Resources and Supports to the Point of Contact with
CUSTOMER/STUDENT/FAMILY
Through Collaborative Effort that is shaped by the Priorities, Constraints, and Mandates of KFLCC Partners and Their Funders
Adult Education & Literacy: The Adult Education Act and the National Literacy Act provide funds for ESL/ABE/GED instruction. These funds are augmented by state governments and are administered by state education agencies. Adult education programs should be available in virtually every community. Eligibility is defined by the ability to function at a literacy level at or below the 12th grade (17 years or older).
Even Start: Even Start is a federally funded family literacy initiative (USDOE) that is administered through state governments. In Texas, it is funded through a competitive grant process in four year cycles run by the state education agency. Eligibility requirements include 1. Residence in a Title One recruitment area 2. Families with children between the age of 0 and 8.3. At least one parent who is in need of adult education as described above.
Head Start: Head Start is a comprehensive child and family development program for economically disadvantaged families with three and four year old children. Head Start exists in virtually every community in the U.S. Typically, child care is provided on a half day basis. Head Start grantees are routinely refunded, except in cases of non-compliance. Some Head Start programs have received awards for Early Head Start which will provide similar services to families with infants and toddlers. Head Start funds flow directly from the federal to the local level.
JOBS/TANF: JOBS (Job Opportunities and Basic Skills) and TANF (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) are basically the welfare reform initiative that is unfolding somewhat differently in every state in the country. The important thing to remember is that funds follow this program( funds that can provide critical supports like child care) and the objective of family self sufficiency is consistent with Title 1 objectives.
JTPA: JTPA (the Job Training and Partnership Act) is a federally funded workforce development program that is administered locally by private industry councils (PICS). Traditionally, PICS have served economically disadvantaged youth and adults who are in search of employment. PICS provide education and training and other supports for eligible clients. Traditionally, PICS have worked with persons who are likely able to get and keep a job within a relatively short time frame (0-2 years).
Local Workforce Development Boards (LWDBS): At the federal level there has been an effort to consolidate some 27 different workforce development programs into a comprehensive workforce development system. The current prevailing vision is that this system should be locally controlled by LWDBS. Among other programs, JTPA will fall under the purview of LWDBS.
One Stop Career Centers: One stop career centers are locations where students, workers, and employers can meet their employment related needs. The concepts of universality, customer choice, program integration, and performance driven outcomes are central to the development of one stop career centers.
Public Schools: The primary delivery system of K-12 education in the U.S. By far, the largest funding source to meet the educational needs of children. Schools should actively partner with other entities in order to maximize opportunities for the children they educate.
Special Projects: All of the entities listed here initiate special projects from time to time. These are usually driven by a competitive grant process. For instance, the KFLCC currently has a grant to operate a special project that focuses of transitioning GED students to well paying jobs or success in post secondary education.
Other Players: Community colleges, foundations, service organizations, volunteers, colleges etc.
1. Just because collaboration is a good idea, that does not mean it is easy. Collaboration is not something you do in addition to your "real job". Done correctly, it becomes a large part of your real job. Program Administrators who view collaboration as a viable approach should consider including language about collaboration in job descriptions.
2. Just as within a single organization, there are multiple levels within collaborations. To be successful, "buy in" to the collaboration needs to be firmly established and nurtured at all levels. The concept of vertical integration is central to successful collaboration. In the early phases of the Kyle Family Learning and Career Center, there was complete buy in at the administrative level. Nobody bothered to inform front line staff of this. More importantly, nobody bothered to seek front line staff input. To the extent possible, include all stakeholders in planning, implementing, and developing the collaboration.
3. Collaborations are made up of individual programs, each of which has its own priorities, mandates, constraints, missions etc. In order for the collaboration to succeed, these priorities, constraints, and missions must be equally valued and honored. If the collaboration fails to meet the objectives of any single partner, all partners will suffer for it. This means that all staff in the collaboration need to be cross trained. Everybody needs to be knowledgeable about each other's program objectives. Data collection systems need to be developed to meet the program reporting requirements of each partner.
4. Accountability and evaluation are tricky issues for successful collaborations. Each component program of the collaboration will have its own system of program monitoring. The data collection system referenced above must be able to meet the accountability demands of each program. The problem is that there is no mechanism for evaluating the effectiveness of the collaboration itself. The reason for this is, in essence, nobody is paying for the collaboration. Collaboration successes and synergies may go unnoticed and, therefore, unpromoted. It is a good idea to take the time to celebrate the successes of the collaboration Thought should be given to the creation of a way to evaluate the effectiveness of the collaboration as a whole.
5. There will be problems. Accept it. The product is worth the problems. Some problems that I can almost guarantee that will arise are as follows.
-Equity: Staff from some programs will inevitably feel that their program is pulling more (or less) than their share of the proverbial load. Resentment and frustration will rear their ugly heads.
-Identity: Successful collaborations tend to subsume the identity of the component programs. This is actually good. It is customer friendly. Clients no longer have to sort out a whole laundry list of programs to find the one they need. Nonetheless, some staff will have very strong attachments and loyalties to their individual programs, and they will see the collaboration as undermining their program and, sometimes, they will act accordingly. Obviously, such actions can have devastating effects.
It is the responsibility of collaboration administrators to "ride herd" on problems like equity and identity. Failure to carefully monitor and periodically address such issues will kill the collaboration.
Like death and taxes, this is a certainty.
Staff retreats and workshops are good vehicles for resolving issues related to equity and identity.
| PROGRAM | # OF CUSTOMERS | # OF HOURS |
| EVENSTART | 40 | 843.5 |
| HEAD START | 15 | 231.5 |
| JTPA | 5 | 160 |
| TEN COUNTY ONLY | 70 | 788.5 |
| JOBS | 3 | 94.5 |
| WIN | 26 | 172 |
| COMPUTER CLASS | 21 | 110 |
| TOTAL | *141 | *1894 |
| PROGRAM | ESL | ABE | GED | PI | PARENTING |
| EVENSTART | 24 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 38 |
| HEAD START | 8 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| JTPA | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| TEN COUNTY ONLY | 42 | 12 | 16 | 0 | 9 |
| JOBS | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 74 | 26 | 31 | 3 | 60 |
| ESL - English as a Second Language | GED - General Equivalency Diploma |
| ABE - Adult Basic Education | PI - Personal Improvement |
| SELF SERVE 118 | CAREER 1 | TRAINING 20 | EMPLOYMENT 51 |
| PROGRAM | # OF CUSTOMERS | # of hours |
| EVENSTART | 40 | 882.5 |
| HEAD START | 11 | 162.5 |
| JTPA | 6 | 225 |
| TEN COUNTY ONLY | 74 | 725 |
| JOBS | 3 | 110.5 |
| WIN | 15 | 176 |
| COMPUTER CLASS | 14 | 84 |
| CDL CLASS | 6 | 18 |
| TOTAL | *145 | *1906 |
| PROGRAM | ESL | ABE | GED | PI | PARENTING |
| EVENSTART | 24 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 36 |
| HEAD START | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| JTPA | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| TEN COUNTY ONLY | 36 | 17 | 20 | 2 | 3 |
| JOBS | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 68 | 31 | 31 | 3 | 46 |
| ESL - English as a Second Language | GED - General Equivalency Diploma |
| ABE - Adult Basic Education | PI - Personal Improvement |
| SELF SERVE 111 | CAREER 15 | TRAINING 13 | EMPLOYMENT 32 |
| PROGRAM | # OF CUSTOMERS | # of hours |
| EVENSTART | 41 | 842.75 |
| HEAD START | 13 | 129.75 |
| JTPA | 5 | 207 |
| TEN COUNTY ONLY | 61 | 523.5 |
| JOBS | 2 | 90 |
| WIN | 14 | 100 |
| COMPUTER CLASS | 4 | 8 |
| CDL CLASS | 7 | 22 |
| TOTAL | *128 | *1593 |
| PROGRAM | ESL | ABE | GED | PI | PARENTING |
| EVENSTART | 20 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 37 |
| HEAD START | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| JTPA | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| TEN COUNTY ONLY | 39 | 8 | 13 | 1 | 3 |
| JOBS | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 64 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 49 |
| ESL - English as a Second Language | GED - General Equivalency Diploma |
| ABE - Adult Basic Education | PI - Personal Improvement |
| SELF SERVE 85 | CAREER 19 | TRAINING 15 | EMPLOYMENT 40 |
MISSION
"The Family Learning and Career Center
is dedicated to the provision
of opportunities for family education,
workforce and personal development,
technological development,
and life long learning for all members
of the community in a
positive caring environment."
Family Literacy Activity Packet
1997 National
Title I Conference "Meeting the Challenge - Serving the Children"
by Martha Ortiz
Director
Even Start Program Audrey Abed
Adult Education Coordinator
Kyle Family Learning & Career Center January 12, 1997
- quality child care providers
- quality early childhood educational activities
- quality PACT (Parent and Child Together) activities prior to a weekly parenting session provided by Even Start Family Educators at Even Start center
Complete the following
form as a task analysis for your family literacy activity.
Who is your community? (Give brief demographic overview of your town.)
State the level of adult learners. (English as a Second Language, Adult
Basic Education, GED, or a mixed level group.)
Objective of the Family Literacy Activity:
Materials/Resources You Will Need:
Description of the Activity:
Adult Learner Outcomes:
Child Learner Outcomes:
How do schools fit into a profamily system? A school that considers families as clients will flex and adapt its procedures to meet the needs of children and families. Working with other agencies in a profamily system of services, schools and school systems can:
Jonathan Engel
Community Development Director, Head Start
Community Action Inc., Hays, Caldwell, & Blanco Counties
P.O. Box 1246
San Marcos, TX 78667
Voice: (512) 396-4564
FAX: (512) 396-4565
E-mail: jonengel@itouch.net
John Hall
Executive Director, Educational/Support Services
Hays CISD
215100 IH 35
Kyle, TX 78640
Voice: (512) 268-0880
FAX: (512) 268-2147
E-mail: jahjah@itouch.net
Martha Ortiz
Director, Even Start Program
Community Action Inc. Of Hays, Caldwell, & Blanco Counties
P.O. Box 1246
San Marcos, TX 78667
Voice: (512) 268-5091
FAX: Same, call first
Mary Helen Martinez
(512) 268-2719
For more information contact: Kyle Family Learning Center
Center Information
| Contact Us
| Projects
| Resources
| Library
| Quarterly Publication
| Documents
|
Calendars
| Hotline
| Discussions
| Research
| Administrators
| Teachers | Workforce
Partnerships |
GED |
Directory of Providers
| Family
Literacy
| EL
Civics
| Site Map
| Home
©1995-2008
Texas Center for the Advancement of Literacy and Learning
1-800-441-READ (7323) or 979-845-6615
FAX: 979-845-0952
E-mail: tcall@tamu.edu
- Melaney Moore-Dodson, Webmaster -
[State
of Texas] [Texas
Homeland Security] [Statewide
Search] [State
Link Policy]
[Legal Notices] [TEA Division of Discretionary
Grants] [Texas
A&M University]
Updated
May 8, 2008